Technology Comparisons

Compare diagnostic technologies

No single technology is "always better" — each answers a different clinical question. These tables show where each method fits in the diagnostic pathway.

Tuberculosis diagnostics

Each step answers a different question — they are complementary, not competing.

FeatureSmear microscopyGeneXpertLPAMGIT cultureWGS
TurnaroundHours≈ 2 hours1–2 daysDays–weeksDays–weeks
Detects TBAFB onlyMTB complexMTB complexViable growthFrom isolate/DNA
Resistance infoNoneRifampicinINH + RIF (+ 2nd-line)Full phenotypic DSTComprehensive genotypic
Viability / ASTNoNoNoYesIsolate needed

Respiratory infection

Rapid antigen tests trade sensitivity for speed; multiplex PCR maximises breadth.

FeatureRapid antigenCulturePCRMultiplex PCR
TurnaroundMinutesDaysHoursHours
ScopeSingle pathogenBacteria/fungi that growSingle targetMany pathogens at once
SensitivityLow–moderateVariableHighHigh (target-specific)

Antimicrobial resistance

Molecular detection predicts resistance mechanisms; phenotypic AST measures actual drug activity.

FeatureDisk diffusionMIC methodsMolecular AMRWGS
MeasuresZone of inhibitionMinimum inhibitory concentrationResistance genes/mutationsAll known resistance loci
Speed18–24 h after isolate18–24 h after isolateHours (direct specimen possible)Days + bioinformatics
CoverageDrugs testedDrugs testedKnown markers onlyComprehensive

Organism identification

MALDI-TOF is shown as a future/optional technology and is not currently an active ID Labs service.

FeatureBiochemical identificationMALDI-TOF MS (future)Molecular identification
Time after isolateHours–overnightMinutesHours
PrincipleMetabolic reactionsProtein mass fingerprintDNA sequence/signature
AST includedNoNoNo (markers only)